TPA Global’s Matrix on Key Transfer Pricing Issues regarding Treasury Activities

[bt_bb_section layout=”wide” lazy_load=”yes” show_boxed_content=”no” allow_content_outside=”no” top_spacing=”” bottom_spacing=”” full_screen=”” vertical_align=”top” color_scheme=”” background_color=”” background_image=”” background_overlay=”” background_position=”” background_size=”” top_section_coverage_image=”” bottom_section_coverage_image=”” parallax=”” parallax_offset=”” background_video_yt=”” yt_video_settings=”” background_video_mp4=”” background_video_ogg=”” background_video_webm=”” responsive=”” publish_datetime=”” expiry_datetime=”” el_id=”” el_class=”” el_style=””][bt_bb_row][bt_bb_column lazy_load=”yes” highlight=”no” align_to_edge_column=”no” width=”1/1″][bt_bb_text]

The UN released an updated draft on financial transactions in April 2019, which in addition to the discussion draft released by OECD in 2018, provides guidance on the disputes in transfer pricing issues. Here we compare the two drafts and advanced domestic practices (i.e. the UK and Australia).

When comparing different key variables to determine (i) an acceptable D/E level; (ii) an acceptable interest rate (includes guarantee fees), OECD draft, UN draft, UK legislation, Australian legislation require the following checks:

  1. Do you apply the arm’s length principle?
  2. Are you obliged to reclassify interest income?
  3. Do you need to conduct the debt capacity analysis?
  4. Can you use the credit rating of lender and/or borrower to support your pricing?
  5. Should you consider implicit support from other group companies as a factor?
  6. Have you chosen the appropriate method?
  7. Are you subject to other legislations related to treasury activities (e.g. thin capitalization rules; safe harbor; anti-avoidance rules)?
  8. What is the sequence to follow for different sets of rules (e.g. D/E ratio vs. Interest rate)?

Click on the button below for the detailed schedule TPA Global uses for the creation, implementation, and documentation of TP systems for Treasury activities.

[/bt_bb_text][bt_bb_separator top_spacing=”small” bottom_spacing=”small” border_style=”none” border_width=”” responsive=”” publish_datetime=”” expiry_datetime=”” el_id=”” el_class=”” el_style=””][/bt_bb_separator][bt_bb_button text=”Download Matrix ” icon=”” icon_position=”left” url=”https://eadn-wc02-12829521.nxedge.io/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/191218-matrix-of-international-guidance-and-selected-domestic-practice-on-financial-transactions.pdf” target=”_self” align=”inherit” size=”small” color_scheme=”dark-accent-skin” style=”filled” shape=”inherit” width=”inline” responsive=”” publish_datetime=”” expiry_datetime=”” el_id=”” el_class=”” el_style=””][/bt_bb_button][/bt_bb_column][/bt_bb_row][/bt_bb_section]

Share on Social Media

Topics

Related articles

The recent amendments to the India-Mauritius DTAA, notably the introduction of the Principal Purpose Test (PPT), signify a pivotal shift in international tax regulations. Designed to scrutinize investments routed through Mauritius, the PPT aims to
Embark on a journey through the dynamic realm of tax reforms in the Netherlands. Delve into proposed alternative measures designed to fortify the Dutch business landscape. From navigating fiscal policy nuances to fostering a resilient
Explore the diverse approaches to Pillar Two implementation across UAE, Sweden, Liechtenstein, and Belgium. From public consultations to draft amendments, each country navigates the complexities of international taxation with unique strategies. Stay informed with expert